![]() The language may have been a bit manipulative, but the point stood: Uber sought a regulatory framework that treated their drivers very differently from cab drivers. Simply put, there is virtually no comparison between taxis and TNCs that use “smart apps” to connect riders looking for transportation to drivers that provide transportation.Īnd what does the City of San Antonio have against veterans, active duty military spouses, retirees, teachers, and single parents, right? They are veterans, spouses of active duty military, retirees, teachers, and single parents. Uber creates a marketplace where these people can use their own car to provide a ride to their neighbors when, where, and how often they want, a strong contrast to taxi, where multiple full-time drivers drive one car 24 hours / 7 days a week with high mileage and significant wear and tear with the majority of the profit going to the taxicab company. To be clear, the majority of Uber partners drive a few hours a week and use their own vehicles (which are inspected by the state of Texas) to make extra income and provide for their families. That argument was at the front of their letter to the San Antonio mayor and city council earlier this spring, when they argued that the regulations the city proposed were too intense: That’s created a playing field that cab drivers have decried as unfair, while Uber argues that its network of drivers serve a fundamentally different role than traditional drivers. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |